Resolute Square

How Christian Nationalism Breeds Toxic Masculinity

Andra Watkins describes toxic masculinity as "feeling entitled to a respect one hasn’t earned simply for being born a white Christian man or being indoctrinated in a white Christian Nationalist family and church, irrespective of adult faith."
Published:August 8, 2024
Share

Published with the generous permission of Andra Watkins. Read all of her outstanding work at How Project 2025 Will Ruin Your Life.

By Andra Watkins

I never understood what real masculine strength was until I married my husband. We’ve been together for 22 years. It has taken me much of that time to parse the difference between true male strength and the Christian Nationalist version I was indoctrinated to accept.

Because I believe the Christian Nationalist version underpins much of American society, even in circles beyond Christian Nationalism.

Christian Nationalists believe the man is superior to the woman because Eve ate the fruit first. She was the weaker of the two sexes. They teach that God cursed her to be ruled by her husband in Genesis 3:16, but Christian Nationalists extend this rule to all white Christian men. We women are supposed to bow the knee to the Mike Johnsons, the Tom Cottons, the Josh Hawleys, and the Sam Alitos, too.

…Thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Genesis 3:16b KJV

As early as kindergarten, I was indoctrinated to accept men and boys as my superiors. The Bible ordained their masculine supremacy; that alone deserved my awe. They were entitled to my respect, whether or not they earned it. I was schooled to let them win arguments, to cede to their opinions as “ladylike” and “godly feminine behavior,” to never ever ever emasculate them or make them feel humiliation or shame.

In Christian Nationalism, sons are almost always the family messiahs. Daughters are afterthoughts, or in my case, the family punching bag, the outhouse, the toilet. These family dynamics further ingrain the Christian Nationalist sense of masculine entitlement: I am the man; God meant for me to lead, and he meant for you to bow to my will.

In many of these churches and families, boys learn to expect deference. They are told they are special; they are coddled; they don’t have to prove themselves to be given their “rightful” place. Real men are respected, regardless of how they misbehave. After all, they reason, isn’t a little misbehavior just boys being boys?

While they talk about Jesus’ servant leadership sometimes, Christian Nationalists praise characters like Paul, a former badass Roman soldier turned Christian. They spend a lot of time highlighting David’s killing of Goliath and Samson’s massacres of entire Philistine armies with his brute strength and bare hands. In recent years, they’ve come to champion Cyrus, a Persian king who wasn’t even a believer, simply because he freed the Israelites from captivity in an epic show of strength.

Turning the other cheek? Letting someone wrong us seventy-times-seven without retaliating? Hanging out with publicans and sinners? Treating others the way we want to be treated? That’s for pussies, which is why they abandoned Jesus in favor of a masculinity that commands respect, even while much of what they label strength is weak and shameful.

Toxic masculinity, to me, is feeling entitled to a respect one hasn’t earned simply for being born a white Christian man or being indoctrinated in a white Christian Nationalist family and church, irrespective of adult faith.


Many of these men don’t know what to do with our disrespect, because they’ve been taught they deserve our adoration and our awe. In their weakness, they lash out; they order people around; they find joy and fulfillment in forcing others to do their will. They believe it is their right to rule over us, even if they have to grab their places illegally or unethically.

Thankfully, my husband is the strongest man I’ve ever met. He taught me what true masculine strength is by loving me and cheering me through every step I’ve taken to go from who I was when we met to who I am today.

I respect his strength because he earns it. Every day. In the way he serves others through his public job. In his patience with his mom and her need of more help. In his long-suffering stoicism with the fucked-up family dynamics he married into. In the joy he gets from teaching new generations to appreciate architecture. In the way he fights for the less fortunate in our community, even when he is maligned and misrepresented. In the way he supports me and cheers me on.


My husband’s masculinity sounds a lot like Tim Walz’s. Maybe because they’re both products of the Midwest. Or maybe they understand that true strength doesn’t call attention to itself. It doesn’t need to flaunt its wealth or bully others or steamroll swathes of the population into submission.Servant leadership takes real strength. Respect is something one must keep earning. Listening is a strong root that keeps one grounded. Tim Walz personifies those traits. May he usher in a new definition of masculinity and inspire many aimless young American men in the process.

Related

  • Key Pete Hegseth Takeaways and How You Stop Him
    Of the Pete Hegseth confirmation hearing, Amee writes, "We should be calling it the 'Kavanaugh: The Redux' considering how well Hegseth is able to lie through his smirks, and distract from the real questions at hand with his boisterous Fox News Narratives."
    January 16, 2025
  • THE DEATH OF SCIENCE: Trump's Project 2025: Up Close & Personal
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    To start, special guest host Stuart Stevens weighs in on day one of the confirmation hearings and the abomination that is the slate of nominees Trump has put forward for some of the most important positions in the Executive Branch. In Chapter 3, the fact-based fictional story of Dr. Yvette Hardman and JJ Newsom depicts the dismantling of expertise and science-based decision making in the federal government under a possible second Trump administration guided by Project 2025. Dr. Hardman, an experienced infectious disease expert, is removed from her position at the CDC and replaced by JJ Newsom, an unqualified political loyalist with no relevant experience. This reflects Project 2025's plan to fill government positions with partisan appointees rather than nonpartisan experts. The new administration rejects science-based pandemic response recommendations from Dr. Hardman instead prioritizing political and economic considerations over public health. This aligns with Project 2025's directives to limit the CDC's ability to make public health recommendations. The story highlights the Trump administration's hostility towards science and the displacement of experienced civil servants, which Project 2025 seeks to accelerate through measures like the "Schedule F" executive order to reclassify and fire federal employees. Overall, the narrative illustrates how a second Trump term guided by Project 2025 would undermine the role of expertise and independent scientific advice in government, with potentially disastrous consequences for public health and safety. Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd also like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: CCH Pounder, Richard Schiff and Jason Kravits who read the chapters and Omid Abtahi, Tom Nichols, Laurie Burke and Joanne Carducci who did the voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal was written by David Pepper and produced by Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman and is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions and The Bill Press Pod. This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. The book, “Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S.
    January 15, 2025
  • Blocking Trump Nominees is Up to Us
    Amee Vanderpool writes, "With several important Congressional Hearings to test the viability of Trump's Cabinet nominees on the horizon, there are still some things that the electorate can do to make their voices heard."
    January 13, 2025
  • IVF: Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal. Chapter Two
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. Chapter Two of Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal depicts the personal story of Eve, a nurse struggling with infertility, whose treatment is threatened by the new president's executive order banning certain fertility treatments. The episode explores how the president's policies would impact everyday Americans, particularly women and families, by interfering with reproductive freedom and the right to self-determination. The author of the serialized novel “2025,” upon which this podcast series is based, David Pepper, highlights how the fictional story is directly based on the policies outlined in the Trump’s Project 2025 and the president's own words, underscoring the very real and devastating consequences a second Trump term and the implementation of Project 2025 could have. You can read Chapter Two of David Pepper’s “2025: A Novel” at davidpepper.substack.com/p/2025-a-novel-chapter-2 The book, “Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S. Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd also like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode. Heather Thomas, J. Smith Cameron, Omid Abtahi, Kirk Acevedo and Bayo Akinfemi. Audio finishing by Marilyn Ernst. This series is produced by David Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman. Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions.
    January 8, 2025
  • The Lingering Shadow of January 6th
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    In our first episode of 2025, Rick takes a hard look back at January 6th, 2021—a day he calls a stain on American democracy. He reflects on the failures of leadership, the lack of accountability, and the enduring dangers posed by Trump and his movement. With unflinching honesty, Rick explores the authoritarian vision of MAGA, the moral compromises of its enablers, and the need to remember and confront the truth of that infamous day.
    January 7, 2025