Resolute Square

This Election Is About FEMALE PERSONHOOD

Andra Watkins writes, "No matter where you live, women's rights are on the ballot."
Published:October 3, 2024
Share

*Andra Watkins is an award winning author, survivor of Christian Nationalism and an expert on Project 2025. Read and support her important work here: How Project 2025 Will Ruin Your Life

By Andra Watkins

We’ve heard Republicans talk about fetal personhood. Why don’t Christian Nationalist Republicans believe in female personhood?

Liberals use words like misogyny and patriarchy to describe the right’s general subjugation of women. While those words are true, they don’t consider the extreme religious zealotry that is truly a denial of what I’m calling female personhood. It’s easier to say “Republicans are cruel” than it is to dig into what makes people fanatics hellbent on denying personhood to half the American population.

Why Christian Nationalists don’t believe in Female Personhood

Christian Nationalists interpret the Bible literally. In Genesis, it says God created Adam first and crafted Eve from his rib. This is not a metaphor or an allegory to Christian Nationalists. They believe God’s design makes Eve (females) part (and property of) Adam (males).

And because Eve ate the forbidden fruit first and convinced Adam to fall with her, females will always be weak, inferior temptresses who must be reminded of their rightful place: One whose personhood (or lack thereof) is defined by men.

How Project 2025 Attacks Female Personhood

In red states, we’ve already seen how Project 2025’s goal to protect life from conception to natural death does not apply to women. Women with unviable pregnancies are forced to carry to term regardless of the risk to their own life or health. To advance the right’s priority on the fetus, women are sent to the parking lot to bleed out. Or they die of sepsis. Or they’re forced to endure a cesarean section when a simple D&C would’ve been safer and less traumatic.

We’ve watched women be charged with crimes for miscarriages. They’ve been denied life-saving medical treatments and have been incarcerated for taking doctor-prescribed medications for illnesses.

Many conservative voters shrug and say Don’t exaggerate! Project 2025 doesn’t say anything about taking away women’s right to vote or own property or exit an abusive marriage. But red states show what the framers of Project 2025 intend to inflict upon females around the country if Republicans win in November.

How Red States Have Attacked Female Personhood

Red states have forced women to be evacuated by helicopter to neighboring jurisdictions for basic healthcare, even as they (Idaho) falsely deny this is happening in the nation’s highest court. They’ve threatened women’s healthcare providers with steep fines and jail time (Texas, Florida, and many other red states) and tried to restrict women’s free state-to-state movement (most notably in Alabama.)

But red state Republicans have denied female personhood in other ways.
In Oklahoma, a state representative (and Christian Nationalist minister) proposed legislation to outlaw no-fault divorce. They believe the Bible says adultery is the only cause for divorce, locking women and children in abusive marriages and untenable controlling situations.

In Texas, the state made a change to property databases that lists all property as being owned by the first name on the deed, usually a man, which could be used to deprive women and children of property rights (reported by Texan Kelley Smoot on Substack.) They have also promoted voting-by-household, where one person (the man) would cast a vote for every eligible voter living under his roof.

How Congressional Republicans Have Attacked Female Personhood

Republicans continually refuse to protect our right to contraception and IVF.
They roll their eyes and gaslight us by claiming it’s hysterical to think these things need legal protection, while taking billions from far-right anti-abortion groups that classify hormonal birth control as an abortifacient and call for an end to IVF.

Outlawing hormonal contraception would severely limit women’s ability to choose to delay pregnancy, thus missing out on things like a college education, advanced degrees, and career opportunities. IVF also makes it possible for women to choose to have a family in balance with other personal and professional goals.

The House of Representatives recently tried to force the SAVE Act into government funding legislation. A critical component of this voting legislation was a requirement that one’s name match a legal document like a birth certificate to prove citizenship. Because many women take their husbands’ names, millions of women could have been disenfranchised weeks before the November election, yet another open attack on female personhood and our corresponding right to vote.

How the Far-Right Supreme Court Has Attacked Female Personhood

We all know about the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v Wade. But Clarence Thomas also noted that he wants to revisit Griswold, which guaranteed the right of married persons to use birth control. His mention is not accidental. Conservative justices have increasingly used opinions to instruct their Federalist Society underlings on how to bring them far-right cases.

We also watched them kick the can down the road on mifepristone and EMTALA, in hopes that an administration change will give them the ability to further erode female personhood. In the former case, both Alito and Thomas name-checked the Comstock Act, their tool to outlaw abortion nationally, even in states where it is constitutionally protected. And since Comstock outlaws ALL abortifacients, this is how they would make most contraception illegal, too.

Female personhood is on the ballot this November.
#voteblueforfemalepersonhood


Whether you identify as female or you love a female or several, a vote for Republicans is a vote to strip women of female personhood. This is what it means when we say We aren’t going back.

Related

  • THE MASS DEPORTATION DISASTER: Trump's Project 2025
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    Special guest host Stuart Stevens introduces the topic of today's episode, Trump's disastrous first week and the incoming deportation calamity likely to take place. The story that leads off Chapter 6 of Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal, Mass Deportation Disaster captures the struggles of 12-year-old Alvaro and his mother in a fictional detention center in West Texas. Alvaro expresses his hunger to his mother, who is too weak to properly care for herself. As they navigate the deteriorating conditions of the camp—overcrowded with diminishing food supplies, hostile guards, and a sense of fear from both authorities and fellow detainees—Alvaro reflects on lost friendships and longing for better times. His mother’s health declines as she sacrifices for him, giving him her piece of bread despite needing it more herself. This highlights Alvaro’s growing awareness of their desperate situation. He learns from a friend, Manuel, about possible escape routes and decides to plan his own escape to ensure both his and his mother’s safety. In the second half of Chapter 6, in a parallel narrative, soldier Jake Caldwell describes the chaos of the detention center from his perspective. As he witnesses the overwhelming influx of women and children, he feels the systemic failures of the camp. The environment strips away humanity, leading children to escape in search of freedom. As both narratives unfold, Alvaro attempts to escape the camp, filled with hope for a future where he can see his mother smile again even as Jake grapples with the moral dilemmas of his role in the oppressive system. Their stories intertwine themes of resilience, sacrifice, and the harsh realities faced by both detainees and guards in the unjust conditions of the camp. We'd like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: Mark Ruffalo and Andrea Guidry who read the chapters and others who contributed character voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser. Trump’s Project 2025:Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: Laurie Burke, Leigh McGowan who read the chapters & Audrey Hakes, Joe Walsh, & others who contributed character voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jonathan Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal was written by David Pepper and produced by Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman and is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions and The Bill Press Pod. This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. The book, “Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S.
    January 27, 2025
  • THE DEPARTMENT OF RETRIBUTION: Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal. Chapter 5
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    Special guest host Stuart Stevens starts by detailing the potential horrors to come from Trump's cabinet. From Kash Patel, Pam Bondi and the rest, this is a group specifically designed to carry out the President's unchecked retribution against his political enemies. In Chapter 5, Part one, the fictional characters Congresswoman Louise Getty and Senator Wade Stiller, former rivals, meet at the World War II Memorial in Washington D.C. They reflect on their pasts and express concern over a hostile political climate under Trump’s second term, feeling fear and paranoia about being surveilled and targeted by the government. Their conversation reveals a sense of vulnerability as they confront the reality that many of their colleagues have abandoned principles out of fear. Louise recalls the intense political maneuvering and betrayals leading up to and following the January 6 insurrection. In Part Two, Woody Nuxhall, the newly appointed head of the Treason and Political Crime Section of the DOJ, oversees his zealous young team of prosecutors, eager to pursue investigations and vendettas against political enemies. The group discusses tactics to surveil and undermine former colleagues and opposition figures, planning a strategy fueled by partisan loyalty and vengeance, while embracing a radical transformation of the DOJ's role in politics. The narrative emphasizes the deeply entrenched fear and moral compromise within Washington's political landscape, contrasting the idealistic memories of past sacrifices with the present-day weaponization of governmental power. Overall, the story highlights the erosion of democratic norms, and the personal toll this environment takes on the individuals involved. While these stories are fictional, they are based on Trump's own words and Project 2025. In fact, the New York Times, just last week reported just how Trump would use the Justice Department to go after his enemies. We’d like to thank the artists who contributed their time to make this episode: Richard Schiff and Morgan Fairchild read the chapters and others who contributed character voices. Sound Design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser. Trump’s Project 2025:Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: Laurie Burke, Leigh McGowan who read the chapters & Audrey Hakes, Joe Walsh, & others who contributed character voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jonathan Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal was written by David Pepper and produced by Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman and is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions and The Bill Press Pod. This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. The book, “Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S.
    January 22, 2025
  • Key Pete Hegseth Takeaways and How You Stop Him
    Of the Pete Hegseth confirmation hearing, Amee writes, "We should be calling it the 'Kavanaugh: The Redux' considering how well Hegseth is able to lie through his smirks, and distract from the real questions at hand with his boisterous Fox News Narratives."
    January 16, 2025
  • THE DEATH OF SCIENCE: Trump's Project 2025: Up Close & Personal
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    To start, special guest host Stuart Stevens weighs in on day one of the confirmation hearings and the abomination that is the slate of nominees Trump has put forward for some of the most important positions in the Executive Branch. In Chapter 3, the fact-based fictional story of Dr. Yvette Hardman and JJ Newsom depicts the dismantling of expertise and science-based decision making in the federal government under a possible second Trump administration guided by Project 2025. Dr. Hardman, an experienced infectious disease expert, is removed from her position at the CDC and replaced by JJ Newsom, an unqualified political loyalist with no relevant experience. This reflects Project 2025's plan to fill government positions with partisan appointees rather than nonpartisan experts. The new administration rejects science-based pandemic response recommendations from Dr. Hardman instead prioritizing political and economic considerations over public health. This aligns with Project 2025's directives to limit the CDC's ability to make public health recommendations. The story highlights the Trump administration's hostility towards science and the displacement of experienced civil servants, which Project 2025 seeks to accelerate through measures like the "Schedule F" executive order to reclassify and fire federal employees. Overall, the narrative illustrates how a second Trump term guided by Project 2025 would undermine the role of expertise and independent scientific advice in government, with potentially disastrous consequences for public health and safety. Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is available on all the podcast apps and at 2025pod.com. We'd also like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: CCH Pounder, Richard Schiff and Jason Kravits who read the chapters and Omid Abtahi, Tom Nichols, Laurie Burke and Joanne Carducci who did the voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal was written by David Pepper and produced by Pepper, Melissa Jo Peltier and Jay Feldman and is a production of Ovington Avenue Productions and The Bill Press Pod. This special series is a joint production by David Pepper and Resolute Square. The book, “Trump’s Project 2025: Up Close And Personal” by David Pepper, is available for purchase at https://a.co/d/adWcJ4S.
    January 15, 2025
  • Blocking Trump Nominees is Up to Us
    Amee Vanderpool writes, "With several important Congressional Hearings to test the viability of Trump's Cabinet nominees on the horizon, there are still some things that the electorate can do to make their voices heard."
    January 13, 2025