Resolute Square
00:00/02:19

The Enablers

Published:January 18, 2024
Out of cowardice or ambition, or both, so many (Republicans) who know better are shredding their principles to endorse a man guilty of so much wrongdoing
Share

*Read all of David's writing and watch his fantastic videos at Pepperspectives!

By David Pepper

Boy have people been walking the plank in recent days.

Apparently, Trump made it clear that he was taking notes on who endorsed him by the Iowa Caucus. So one by one, from Marco Rubio and other Senators to former Governor and Presidential candidate Doug Burgum to Ohio’s LG Jon Husted, they stepped down to the end of that plank and jumped right off—endorsing Trump for President.

In a similar way, we’re also seeing leading Republicans who’d endorsed Haley or DeSantis now quick to say that of course they’d vote for Trump over Biden. Take Governor Chris Sununu of New Hampshire, who’s spent years cultivating a brand that he’s more reasonable than the Trump wing of the party. Heck, a year ago, at a dinner, Sununu even called Trump “f-ing crazy”—later saying that “[t]his is not the Donald Trump of 2016. Don’t fool yourself…he doesn’t have the energy.” But now, Sununu apparently thinks “f-ing crazy” would still be better than Joe Biden. Kim Reynolds, Iowa Governor and a big DeSantis backer, said the same thing yesterday.

On the one hand, the whole sight is pathetic. Out of cowardice or ambition, or both, so many who know better are shredding their principles to endorse a man guilty of so much wrongdoing, including attacking democracy and our Constitution itself in front of the entire nation.

But it’s actually more than just pathetic.

As I explain in the video above, if you look at history—and the pattern of how authoritarians rise to power—kowtowing and enabling by more trusted elites in their own party are essential first steps. And therefore they are among the first tasks on the autocrat-wannabe’s “to do” list.
Let me quote my friend Ruth Ben-Giat, one of our country’s foremost experts on authoritarianism, from her must-read book “Strongmen”:

“Elites are the authoritarian’s most important promoters and collaborators. Afraid of losing their class, general or race privileges, influential individuals bring the insurgent into the political system, thinking he can be controlled as he solves their problems….Once the ruler is in power, elites strike an ‘authoritarian bargain’ that promises them power and security in return to loyalty to the ruler and toleration of his suspension of rights. Some are true believers, and others fear the consequences of subtracting their support, but those who sign on tend to stick with the leader through gross mismanagement, impeachment, or intentional humiliation.” (page 14)



Or in my recent review of Garden of Beasts, I summarized how,
“early on, Hitler and his inner circle of loyalists (in their 40s or younger) are dismissed by others as clownish. Buffoons. Adolescents. Not serious. Germans and foreign diplomats alike just assume they won’t last long, and that elder statesman who still wield considerable public sway and power—or a lower tier of more serious-minded officials waiting in the wings—who know better will at some point just push them aside so the “adults” can be back in charge….And because they too don’t take the threat of Hitler seriously, those German “adults” also go along with it. They decide it’s better to go along in the short term, confident that Hitler and his ilk won’t last long. Or confident that they can control Hitler at the time they need to. We now know that all that time accommodating and legitimizing was critical as Hitler consolidated his power.”




So when Rubio and Sununu and Husted endorse Trump and his extremism, they are doing more than lifting him. They are sanitizing him. Normalizing him. Wrapping him in their more moderate brands. They think it helps them—but it truly is essential for HIM.

And that, history proves, is dangerous as hell.

It also underscores why—when other similarly situated Republicans do stand up to him—we need to value those voices.

Be they Liz Cheney or—yesterday—Asa Hutchinson.

We saw the importance of those voices play out first hand last year.

Ohio’s Issue 1 (the one in August) went down in flames in part because enough Republican leaders (former officials, but well known) who knew better were willing to say so. Publicly. And their voices (standing up to their party, their Governor and the entire legislature) gave cover and license to everyday Republicans to join them (and reject their party) in voting No in August. And that created an unbeatable bipartisan voting coalition that sent that sneak attack on Ohio’s democracy down in flames.

So let’s learn the lesson even if so many are failing to: those with standing who enable Trump are risking our nation’s democracy for their own self-serving goals, which makes them dangerous. Reckless. Call them out for it. Demand they do better. Remember it the next time they seek office.

Those with standing who stand up to Trump are playing a pivotal role in protecting democracy—even if we may disagree with them on a broad swath of other issues.

Thank them. Their voices matter with voters we will need to protect democracy in this cycle, and in the long run.

Related

  • Lies, Lies, and More Lies
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    How do we fact check in an ocean of lies? In this episode Rick is joined by Bill Adair, the founder of PolitiFact and a professor at Duke University, to discuss the growing epidemic of political lying, especially within the Republican Party. They explore the history of political dishonesty, the role of conservative media in amplifying misinformation, and the challenges of fact-checking in an era dominated by figures like Donald Trump. The conversation highlights the danger that widespread deception poses to democracy and addresses the role of new technologies, like deepfakes, in further distorting truth in political discourse. Bill's book, Beyond the Big Lie: The Epidemic of Political Lying, Why Republicans Do It More, and How It Could Burn Down Our Democracy, available now.
    October 21, 2024
  • Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal Chapter 7 -The Brutal Attack on Workers and Unions

    Trump's Project 2025: Up Close And Personal

    In this episode of Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal, we see the real-life effects of this assault on unions and workers. In our fictional story, two legendary high school football players, Turk Foster and DeAndre McCollum, still relish their past glory. But they are struggling to navigate the rule changes proposed by Project 2025 that undercut the power of unions and tilt the playing field in favor of the employers to the detriment of employees. Turk struggles with his job as a union electrician as wages and job security diminish. He feels the weight of expectation on his son, who may soon forgo football to support the family by taking a job, previously off limits to teenagers in a plant in town. DeAndre’s wife, a nurse, has had her hours cut and has to cope with last minute schedule changes that disrupt their family life. In the second half of the episode, Bruce Lipton, the fictional private equity executive, plays golf with his HR consultant Dudley Brennan. Their conversation reveals the ruthless cost-cutting measures undertaken by their firm, Bald Eagle Capital, and the broader privatized economy shaped by the election of Donald Trump and the deregulation as proposed in Project 2025. Dudley lists strategies like eliminating union protections, utilizing young workers—including hiring teenagers for hazardous jobs—and reducing overtime expenses. Despite his discomfort with these practices, Bruce feels pressured to comply with the aggressive corporate tactics that prioritize profit over worker safety and rights, reflecting an uncomfortable tension between his upbringing in a union household and the cutthroat world of private equity. The chapter concludes with Bruce's disillusionment leading him to leave the golf course, symbolizing his internal conflict over the ethical implications of his work. We'd like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: Wendell Pierce and Fisher Stevens who read the chapters and others who contributed character voices. Sound design by Marilys Ernst and Jon Moser
    October 18, 2024
  • Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal-The Assault on Public Education

    Trump's Project 2025: Up Close And Personal

    Project 2025 proposes to eliminate the Department of Education and divert federal education funding into universal school voucher programs, allowing public money to be used for private and for-profit schools. This would result in cuts to critical services and programs at public schools, including mental health counseling, school resource officers, after-school programs, reading/writing specialists, and services for students with disabilities. Classroom sizes at public schools would increase substantially due to the funding cuts, hampering the ability to provide a quality education. The plan also calls for the censorship of curriculum and book banning related to topics like racial equity, LGBTQ issues, and reproductive health. Private for-profit schools receiving voucher funds have been found to use substandard or misleading curriculum, including teaching that dinosaurs and humans co-existed and that slavery was not as bad as portrayed. Overall, the goal of Project 2025 is to end public education in the United States in favor of a privatized, deregulated school system, with devastating consequences for students, especially those from lower-income families and communities. Based on the actual proposals and likely consequences above, the fictional based stories begin as Martha Sheakley, the principal of Southeast Middle School, faces the challenges of new controversial book-banning laws that require the removal of numerous classics from the library. As she meets with librarian Paige Parker, they express their frustration over the vague standards forcing them to censor popular titles, including works by Toni Morrison and Anne Frank. Martha is frustrated with the political landscape affecting education and the consequences of enforcing these new laws. Martha then attends a distressing meeting about school funding. Due to the government's shift to vouchers for private schools, public schools face severe funding cuts. She learns they must eliminate wrap-around services and support staff, including mental health counselors, after-care programs, and special education resources. These cuts threaten the well-being of students and the overall educational environment. The meeting exposes the deepening crisis in public education as more responsibilities are pushed onto families with lower income and fewer resources. After a day filled with painful decisions and meetings, Martha encounters law enforcement taking away censored books from the library, further highlighting the absurdity and tragedy of censorship in education. As the day ends, Martha reflects on the privilege of parents benefitting from the new policies while her own students and staff suffer the consequences. In parallel, Marcus and other parents share their concerns about Blue Ribbon Academy, a new school that seemed promising but delivered a disappointing reality. They discover misleading curriculum materials that trivialize serious historical issues and provide an inadequate education. As they navigate their experiences trying to advocate for better education options for their children, they are met with resistance from the Blue Ribbon administration, which has no accountability to the public. Despite their efforts, the parents ultimately face the grim reality that shifts in educational policy have sidelined their children, particularly those with special needs like Marcus's son, Jamal, who is deemed "not a good fit" for Blue Ribbon due to his ADHD. This reflects a larger trend of public schools becoming underfunded and unable to meet the needs of diverse learners as more families are funneled into less supportive educational environments. We'd like to thank all the artists who volunteered their time to make this episode: Ever Carradine and Don Cheadle who read the chapters and others who contributed character voices. Sound design by Johnathan Moser. Trump's Project 2025: Up Close and Personal is written by David Pepper
    October 18, 2024
  • This Is What Fascism Looks And Sounds Like Today
    Dr. Jennifer Mercieca writes: "Trump's rallies and scripted television appearances are a fascist catechism of calls and responses where indoctrination occurs through scary fear appeals, promises of protection, and commitments of loyalty."
    October 17, 2024
  • Trump is a Fascist
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    Today we keep it simple. Trump is actually a fascist, Rick explains why he is an enemy to us all.
    October 16, 2024