Resolute Square

Gagged, and Gagged Again

"'I can do whatever I want,' Trump said in a speech on October 11, 'but I did nothing wrong'... it could have just as easily been a statement about any of the cases against him. Or, really, it could have been a statement about anything he might ever be accused of doing wrong. It’s his life philosophy," writes Dr. Jen Mercieca.
Published:October 19, 2023
Share

By Dr. Jennifer Mercieca
 
Twice impeached and quadruply indicted on 91 felony charges, former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump can now add “twice gagged” to his list of ignominious accomplishments.
 
“I can do whatever I want,” Trump said in a speech on October 11, “but I did nothing wrong.” He was talking about the case proceeding against him for stealing and hoarding government documents, but it could have just as easily been a statement about any of the cases against him. Or, really, it could have been a statement about anything he might ever be accused of doing wrong. It’s his life philosophy. Trump can do whatever he wants, and no one can stop him or hold him accountable because whatever he wants to do is, by (his) definition, right, not wrong.
 
Up to this point in his life, Trump has been able to get away with doing whatever he wants; he has lived his life as an unaccountable leader (a “demagogue”). Now, the demagogue is twice gagged.
 
So far, judges in two of the four cases proceeding against Trump in courts have been forced to implement limited gag orders against him “in order to safeguard the integrity of these proceedings,” as United States District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan explained in her written order gagging Trump this week. The safeguard measure is necessary, Chutkan said, because Trump’s demagogic attacks against “individuals involved in the judicial process, including potential witnesses, prosecutors, and court staff” posed “sufficiently grave threats” that she was forced by Trump’s actions to protect the court to protect the rule of law.
 
There was once a time when political pundits could wonder if Trump’s words ought to be taken “literally or seriously,” but that time is long past. The gag order establishes something that rhetoric scholars like me have been saying since 2015: Trump’s threats against the judicial process are both literal and serious threats to the rule of law. The gag orders are a long overdue legal recognition of Trump’s demagoguery.
 
Trump has used words as a weapon since he launched his presidential campaign. He has used words as a weapon to attack the weak and vulnerable. He has used words as a weapon to attack his political opposition in both parties. He has used words as a weapon to attack reporters and the media. He has used words as a weapon to attack the FBI, DOJ, and Special Counsel. He has used words as a weapon to intimidate and extort foreign allies. He has used words as a weapon to attack legal investigations into his conduct. He has used words as a weapon against impeachment inquiries. He has used words as a weapon against the American election process. He has used words as a weapon against the peaceful transfer of power. He has used words as a weapon against democracy and the government of the United States.
 
Believing that he can do no wrong, Donald Trump has spent the previous eight years using words as a weapon against any version of truth or reality that he didn’t like. These gag orders recognize both that Trump’s words are a literal threat and that his words are a serious threat to the rule of law in America. It turns out that not only can Trump do wrong, but he can be held accountable for it.
 
The judges highlighted two of the demagogic strategies that Trump has used since 2015 to attack, coerce, and gain compliance over others: first, ad hominem (Latin for “appeal to the person,” attacking the person instead of their argument). Demagogues use ad hominem to misdirect the audience’s attention away from the central issue of the debate (Trump’s crimes, for example) and attack the character of their opponents. Second, Trump uses argument ad baculum (Latin for “appeal to the stick,” threats of force or intimidation). Demagogues use ad baculum to shift attention away from the central issue of the debate (Trump’s crimes) and to threaten, intimidate, and overwhelm opponents so that they won’t make a case against the demagogue.
 
Chutkan found that Trump’s personal insults and threats pose a “significant and immediate risk” to the judicial process in two ways: “witnesses will be intimidated or otherwise unduly influenced by the prospect of being themselves targeted for harassment or threats; and attorneys, public servants, and other court staff will themselves become targets for threats and harassment.”
 
Trump’s demagogic attacks have already resulted in harms to the judicial process. “Undisputed testimony cited by the government,” explained Chutkan’s written gag order, “demonstrates that when Defendant [Trump] has publicly attacked individuals, including on matters related to this case, those individuals are consequently threatened and harassed.” Therefore, Chutkan’s responsibility to protect the fairness of the trial required her to gag Trump. “The bottom line is that equal justice under law requires the equal treatment of criminal defendants; Defendant’s presidential candidacy cannot excuse statements that would otherwise intolerably jeopardize these proceedings.”
 
Trump uses language as a weapon to prevent others from holding him accountable for his words and actions, but now the judges who will ultimately decide his fate have gagged him, then gagged again. In so doing, they have acknowledged that Trump communicates irresponsibly and undemocratically.
 
Since he’s been gagged, Trump’s emails to supporters have been filled with whining complaints about being gagged, and he’s continued to attack New York Attorney General Letitia James over his civil fraud case. It’s probably just a matter of time before Trump violates the gag rules.
 
“Donald Trump can call me names. Donald Trump can try to cause distractions. But at the end of the day,” James tweeted in response to Trump’s demagoguery, recentering our attention to the central issue of the debate (Trump’s crimes): “he engaged in persistent fraud, and we will continue to demonstrate that in court.” The courtroom may be the only place a demagogue like Trump is held accountable for his words and actions.

Related

  • Inequality in the United States: A Choice, Not Destiny
    It's not your imagination. The deck is stacked in favor of the super-wealthy. Brian Daitzman explains why inequality continues to expand in the US and how tax policies under Trump advantaging the rich made them far richer at the expense of middle and lower income Americans.
    May 23, 2024
  • Beware The Lawyers (Follow-Up)
    Teri Kanefield writes that in the end, "All we’ve got are individual people formed by the norms and institutions they are embedded in making decisions, hopefully coming to the right conclusions and acting in good faith. Or at the very least, bowing to some sense of public pressure or shame not to do the wrong thing."
    May 22, 2024
  • From FBI Director to Novelist
    The Enemies List

    Rick Wilson's The Enemies List

    James Comey writes fiction! On the show today, the former FBI Director joins to discuss his latest novel, "Westport." They explore the inspiration behind Comey's second foray into fiction, drawing from his time at a hedge fund and his experiences in law enforcement. The conversation dives into the current political landscape, focusing on the high-profile trials of Donald Trump and their implications for the rule of law. Comey shares his insights on the importance of the DOJ and FBI's independence, the potential consequences of politicizing these institutions, and his outlook on upcoming legal battles.
    May 22, 2024
  • David Pepper Joins The Strategy Session
    Strategy Session

    Strategy Session

    An intense, important, eye-opening episode with David Pepper in the house. What are the tactics of those destroying democracy from the state level on up? Join David, Stuart, and Joe for the strategy that gets us to the future we want and deserve.
    May 21, 2024
  • Trump's Toadies Take Manhattan!

    Decoding Fox News

    Fox News completely forgot about pro-Palestinian protesters and the Israel-Hamas War choosing instead to focus on Trump’s criminal hush money trial in Manhattan. The network featured Trump’s toadies - a legion of lawmakers desperate to suck up to their dear leader. Jesse Watters claimed Trump was meditating in court - not nodding off. Judge Jeanine Pirro clutched her pearls over Biden’s joke “I hear you’re free on Wednesdays.” Laura Ingraham defended a NFL kicker’s commencement speech and Rachel Campos-Duffy pitted Black Americans against Latino Americans. Eric Shawn continued to drop truth bombs and Steve Doocy went rogue!
    May 21, 2024